120 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
120 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
# DoubleVerify
|
||
|
||
- google sheets formula to add True/False to a cell if previous cell has a DV email or not - =IF(REGEXMATCH(B4, "@doubleverify"), True, False)
|
||
|
||
* Request from Rachel for Custom Report via Looker
|
||
· Date Range: Last 30 Days
|
||
· Learner Name
|
||
· Learner Email (please exclude anyone with an @doubleverify.com email address – looking for non-DV team members only)
|
||
· Course Progress
|
||
· Course Name
|
||
|
||
## Demo with Mark Protus
|
||
Integration with LI Learning
|
||
Wants to stay within LMS and consume LinkedIn Learning content
|
||
Build learning paths using linked in cirricula and them make them availble within Northpass
|
||
Utilize BBHR integration
|
||
COmpliance training would be via LinkedIn Learning and Traliant
|
||
Know4 bet
|
||
|
||
## Meeting with Mark Protus, New SVP of L&D
|
||
Questions about usability
|
||
Do we have a common database or individual databases per customer?
|
||
- common
|
||
|
||
Thinks the user experience isnt the best, espeically as it relates to SCORM
|
||
Conflicting table of contents with SCORM files
|
||
Both have Continue buttons at the bottom of the screen which is confusing
|
||
They refuse to put in milestones for some reason
|
||
- [X] How can we provide the smoothest SCORM format and experience?
|
||
- [X] Send him best practices for SCORM files
|
||
|
||
Shot down my questions about what HIS ideal SCORM experience is.
|
||
What settings need to be set to export and allow auto-full screen in SCORM?
|
||
Best Practices for SCORM? Whta are other clients doing
|
||
Share as many best practices.
|
||
|
||
They are moving in the direction of SCORM only
|
||
And a microlearning approach
|
||
From a learner's perspective, if he's authenticated as himself, how can we serve up perscriptive learning?
|
||
|
||
Other things to share:
|
||
- [X] Screenshots of other academies
|
||
- [X] Vidyard
|
||
|
||
Send best practices
|
||
Examples - vineyard recordings
|
||
What are other enterprise clients doing that’s successful?
|
||
TOC and Continue buttons are confusing
|
||
Same with surveys - continue button is confusing
|
||
New browser window -
|
||
They cannot check if they actually completed the SCORM package or not
|
||
How to check in analytics
|
||
He wants to add timeframe for when they have to complete next training?
|
||
Quizzes - how can we take out SCORM data
|
||
|
||
## Siying Mark SCORM Asks
|
||
Embedding Questions regarding SCORM files
|
||
- They want to see what quick solutions there are to adding a RISE course in Northpass
|
||
- Want to start creating those courses in RISE
|
||
- Per Course Settings (such as full screen)
|
||
|
||
* What are their needs?
|
||
- For a RISE course, once they hit start, auto-full screen
|
||
- No Northpass TOC
|
||
- Only make Continue Button once a certain percentage completion happens
|
||
- Hide any milestone messaging
|
||
- Complete/Incomplete,
|
||
- Optimal experience is:
|
||
- Once Rise Starts, All NP controls hide
|
||
- once they complete the SCORM file, continue is hit auto, or auto end of course screen
|
||
- They won't be using quizzes consistently
|
||
- CLick here to end course should go back to main dashboard
|
||
- SCORM Analytic is no longer there for Siying
|
||
|
||
* Question from Mark
|
||
- .corp and .com issues with Okta
|
||
-
|
||
|
||
## Siying regarding Mark & Temperature Check
|
||
- Big Focus is scalability
|
||
- Moving tom Storyline to Rise
|
||
* Not all courses will be going to Rise
|
||
* Need customizability on course-based full screen settings SCORM
|
||
* This would be very impactful
|
||
- Mark could be concerned about the Rise courses being a better experience for learners
|
||
- Siying raised ticket regarding full screen with SCORM files
|
||
- Second thing, how to enable people managers?
|
||
* The ppl manager will have more responsibility for their employees journey
|
||
* No organizational structure in NP
|
||
* HR Ops should be joining the learning team
|
||
* If BBHR was connected to Okta, the learner account would be messed up
|
||
* Those people should have a dashboard to see how the team is doing
|
||
* A learner's dashboard - like what they need to complete, etc
|
||
* Eric previously told them it would be extra money, this was before they were enterprise
|
||
* They have some courses with credentials, but it isn't visualized
|
||
* How to visualize their certs and completions etc
|
||
* Checklist for the learners too
|
||
- Third thing, Data Collection and Specificty
|
||
* Collecting data from SCORM package, they want more details
|
||
* How can they collaborate the SCORM functionality into Northpass Data
|
||
* Currently, they can create Northpass quizzes, but it needs to be shared with external stakeholders
|
||
* They don't like scheduled reporting?
|
||
* The team that recieves the reports prefers survey monkey
|
||
* How to quickly generate data and more robust data points
|
||
* Faster insights - more vizualisations
|
||
* This is to share with others that don't have backend access
|
||
* The admin dash for a manager is too confusing, it needs to be simpler
|
||
* Maybe not going into the backend, but an easier way to share this information
|
||
* Example: Survey Monkey has a link where you can share a link that has analytics easily available
|
||
* The link is dynamic and you don't have to update the content everytime to send it along
|
||
* Graphics are automated in the background of SurveyMonkey
|
||
* Siying is getting pressure from others to use SurveyMonkey as the standard approach for learning and assesments
|
||
* Data Privacy for SurveyMonkey, is it safe to share?
|
||
|
||
Mark wants to use Rise more. With all the above and the full-screen settings with Rise is making it harder to use the table of contents, then with all the layout, and then the assesment outside of the SCORM package feels jarring
|
||
|
||
## Okta Errors
|
||
Who should be on the call - Sowmya, Yoav, Lukasz
|
||
|